All manuscripts must be submitted electronically through the journal’s  official online system. After submission, all of the manscripts are evaluated  by the edior-in-chief for their scientific contribution, originality and  content. Manuscripts are evaluated in accordance  with the principles of double-blinded peer review.  Editor-in-chief makes the initial decision  based on manuscript’s quality and editorial priorities. Manuscripts may be rejected without peer  review by the editor-in-chief if they are beyond the scope of the journal. After editor-in-chief’s decision, manuscripts are  technically evaluated. At that stage, all manuscripts not prepared in the  format provided on the journal’s website will return to the authors. Technical  editors also check similarity of the manuscript. Any manuscript with a similarity index that is higher than  the permitted threshold (>%25) will return to authors.
  
  Manuscripts considered to be scientifically adequate, technically  suitable and that pass the  initial evaluation, are assigned to at least two reviewers for external peer review, to be evaluated in accordance  with the principles of double-blinded peer review.  The coordinating editors send the manuscript  to reviewers. These reviewers are  independent experts and members of the editorial board who have published  internationally on the topic of the manuscript. Research articles, systematic reviews  and meta-analyses might be also evaluated by the Statistics editor, if editor  in chief and/or reviewers ask any statistical evaluation. 
  
  All of the manuscripts are scanned by the  Editor-in-Chief’s Office using the iThenticate program for determination of  plagiarism and non-ethical situations. Also, all manuscripts are reviewed and  edited for compliance with the rules of English grammar. All contributing  authors of a manuscript accepted for publication are deemed to have accepted  the right of editors to make corrections provided that no fundamental change is  made to the basic meaning of the original text. The Coordinating Editor recommends a decision based on the  reviewers’ recommendations and returns the manuscript to the Editor-in-Chief. 
  
  The Editor-in-Chief makes a final decision based on  editorial priorities, manuscript quality, and reviewer recommendations. If  there are any conflicting recommendations from reviewers, the Editor-in-Chief  can assign a new reviewer. Manuscripts not accorded priority for publication by the Editor-in-Chief,  Editors and Reviewers are rejected. 
  
  After a manuscript has been accepted for publication, the  author will not be permitted to make any changes that constitute departures  from the manuscript that was accepted by the editor. Before publication, the  galley proofs are always sent to the authors for corrections. Mistakes or  omissions that occur due to some negligence on our part during final printing  will be rectified in an errata section in a later issue. This does not include  those errors left uncorrected by the author in the galley proof.